//
you're reading...
Film 52.177

#6 “Safe House”

Last night was the annual Valentine’s ball, a fundraiser and award ceremony for undergraduate college scholarships. In the silent auction, I successfully bid on a lovely small surrealist painting of a train flying over a pueblo done by a local artist, though I lost out on some funky antique jewelry. It’s really wonderful to meet the scholarship recipients and their families. I look forward to the event each year. After dancing to the musical stylings of the Nash Hernandez Orchestra and leading a cumbia line around the dance floor [oh, yes I did], like Cinderella, ella, ella, I dashed out of the ball. My date and I hurried our way to the movie theater in order to catch the day’s last showing of Safe House directed by the Swedish Latino Mr. Daniel Espinosa from TrÃ¥ngsund, Stockholm. While we got to the multiplex with moments to spare, turns out we went to the wrong location [my fault]. Elitistacademic fail, not to mention I was denied the novelty or rather the oddity of attending a late show in a ballgown.

Second-time’s a charm. Upon reflection, maybe it was sign that we should have seen something else. I read a description of Safe House online, and it was utterly impenetrable. Something about a “backwater post,” a “housekeeper,” and some spies. I immediately thought The Help meets Jason Bourne, and my money was on Minny. I was intrigued, sorta. I love me some Denzel; Ryan Reynolds is charming and unoffensive. But this movie was . . . well it was unnecessarily long for one thing. 1:55 was too much time for the inevitably of that ending. And dammit, I should not be able to identify the villain even before all the major characters have been introduced. I was also confused about why a safe house with every kind of pass key and super high-tech security devise, except a full-body scanner, could be penetrated so easily simply by shutting down the power. Anybody with some bolt cutters or C-4 could waltz right in with an assault team and “so long house guest.” Some security upgrades are most definitely in order.

I also need someone to explain to me the necessity of setting Safe House in South Africa, a locale made all the more problematic by the racial politics of the film. How is it that in the cinematic global village, Latinos are still thugging it up? Triste. Speaking of which, what’s up with all the super spy weeping? Ryan cries, a lot. Denzel cries. Towards the end, I was ready to cry because I needed the film to be over. I say, be gone super tight shots of close combat. Who can see what’s going on anyway? I say, adios multiple endings. Who needs three or four false conclusions? Cut that mess off and give me a badass parting shot. Finally I say, au revior to one liners, and with that, I bid you adieu. Not to worry, “I’ll take it from here.”

About these ads

Discussion

3 Responses to “#6 “Safe House””

  1. I’d give it a B-/B, EA. There were SO many feelings and explosions and reassurances to the audience that Ryan Reynolds was not gay despite all the weeping. And more feelings and more explosions. No surprises. Denzel “The Black Dorian Gray” Washington was quite good. I did think the final ending was bs. I could have taken any one of the earlier options.

    p.s. Have you thought about grading these films?

    Posted by donika | February 17, 2012, 11:35 pm
    • Oh my goodness those four endings were too much. The action was VERY actiony. And the explosions were . . . well you know, boomy. But I don’t think I can give it greater than a solid C. How many times do we have to listen to Frost tell Weston that he was the better man? And Mad Eye? C’mon!

      Posted by elitistacademic | February 17, 2012, 11:54 pm
  2. I believe the following email will explain a lot about my reaction to the film. I sent it to two of my dudes:

    “Dear dudes,

    I think we should go see a movie where things blow up or men have lots of feelings or, if possible, a Cold War spy movie (which I occasionally get a hankering for). To that end, I propose that we see Safe House (a Denzel Washington CIA movie), The Grey (A Liam Neeson survival wolf eating movie), or Tinker, Tailor, Soldier Spy (Cold War spy movie with Gary Oldman).”

    And somehow Safe House met all of those needs. I feel like in action movies, the plot is tertiary to the spectacle, and I like it.

    Posted by donika | February 18, 2012, 6:22 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 51 other followers

Tweety Morsels

Previous Gems

February 2012
M T W T F S S
« Jan   Mar »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829  
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 51 other followers

%d bloggers like this: